|
SNP candidate for North East Fife, Rod Campbell, has hit out
against Labour plans to scrap attendance allowance for nearly 170,000 elderly and disabled Scots.
The plans, announced by Gordon Brown, will see attendance allowance scrapped to fund a National Care Service
in England with no consideration of Scottish pensioners. Figures from the Department for Work and
Pensions and the Institute for Social and Economic Research show that 167,940 people in Scotland receive attendance
allowance. Independent research by ISER shows that removing attendance allowance would push 40% of those people into
poverty, or 67,000 Scots. That’s 880 people in North East Fife.
In addition to removing attendance allowance Scotland’s
carers could also be affected. Receipt of AA by the disabled person is one of the grounds for receipt of Carer’s
Allowance by the carer and its removal could affect 46,300 carers in Scotland.
The proposals have been opposed by Age
Concern, Help the Aged, Royal National Institute for the Blind, MacMillan Cancer Support and Leonard Cheshire
Disability and a petition on the Downing Street website has attracted 23,705 signatures.
Commenting, Mr Campbell said: “This
will be terrible news for some of North East Fife’s most vulnerable people. It is inconceivable that instead of
tackling poverty, Labour is planning to push 67,000 Scots – some of our most vulnerable residents –
into poverty and remove funding from a further 100,000.
“Nearly a thousand North East Fifers
will really suffer under these plans. This is a clear sign of how little the UK Government considers its impact
on Scotland and in particular on vulnerable Scots.
“Attendance Allowance offers essential support to many of Scotland’s
elderly and disabled residents and helps Scotland’s carers. To get rid of this valuable benefit would be
a hammer blow to elderly and disabled Scots.
“Without Attendance Allowance more elderly people would be forced out
of their homes into the care system instead of living independently in their homes.
“This
proposal is entirely focussed on England with no attention paid to the consequences in Scotland. Labour’s plans
ignore Scotland completely.” ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 1. Attached
are details of the number of attendance allowance recipients (according to the Department for Work and Pensions) in
each Westminster constituency. 2. Charities who deal with elderly and disabled people have united in opposition
to Labour’s plans: Age Concern and Help the Aged are opposed to the move, pointing out that ‘That extra
bit of help may help prevent, or delay the need for more formal care.’ The Royal National Institute for Blind
People (RNIB) is actively campaigning against the proposals as some 53,000 blind and partially sighted people
across the UK receive AA. Macmillan Cancer Support has also expressed concern, fearing that removing AA ‘would
leave many cancer patients over 65 unable to pay for the extra costs of disability, such as a special diet, higher fuel
bills or travel to hospital.’ Leonard Cheshire Disability stated in their response to the Green Paper they would be ‘strongly opposed’ to integrating AA into the social care system – adding: ‘…it
simply does not make sense to look to remove elements that are actually working successfully at present.’ 3.
Attendance Allowance (AA) is a non means tested tax free benefit paid to people over the age of 65 requiring help from
another person due to severe mental or physical disability. It is paid directly into an account of the recipient’s
choice. It is paid at two different rates: o Higher rate: £70.35 per week o Lower rate: £47.10
per week The Higher rate applies to those needing help both day and night. The Lower rate applies to those needing
help either day or night. 4. Motions for Thursday 14 January 2010 Government Motion: S3M-5515 Alex Neil: Attendance
Allowance for People with Disabilities—That the Parliament notes that the UK Green Paper, Shaping the Future
of Care Together, published in June 2009, may have long-term implications for vulnerable older and disabled people in
Scotland who are eligible for attendance allowance and disability living allowance as it proposes to remove the
universal benefits of attendance allowance and disability living allowance and instead redesign the benefit system to meet English social policy objectives and redirect funding to pay for the provision of a National Care Service
in England, while failing to give adequate consideration to the position in Scotland, and calls on HM Government
to consult fully with the Scottish Government, the Scottish Parliament, local authorities, NHS boards and other interested
parties before proceeding any further. ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; Attendance Allowance recipients by Westminster constituency The UK Labour Government is seeking
to abolish Attendance Allowance (AA) across the UK to pay for reform of the social care regime in England. AA is a non means tested benefit paid to elderly disabled people. There are
168,000 recipients of AA in Scotland. A recent analysis by the Institute for Social and Economic
Research (ISER) predicted that the removal of AA would mean 40% of current recipients would fall below the poverty line. Across Scotland, that would mean over 67,000 of our most vulnerable people being forced into
poverty by a Labour Government. The table below breaks down the number of people in each
Westminster constituency who face losing this lifeline benefit, as well as the number of people who face poverty as a result. | Westminster
Constituency | Attendance Allowance (AA) Recipients | No. facing poverty if AA is removed* | Aberdeen
North | 2420 | 968 | Aberdeen
South | 2140 | 856 | Airdrie and
Shotts | 2920 | 1168 | Angus | 2790 | 1116 | Argyll and Bute | 3550 | 1420 | Ayr,
Carrick and Cumnock | 4050 | 1620 | Banff
and Buchan | 2340 | 936 | Berwickshire,
Roxburgh and Selkirk | 2740 | 1096 | Caithness,
Sutherland and Easter Ross | 1810 | 724 | Central Ayrshire | 3270 | 1308 | Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill | 3490 | 1396 | Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East | 2850 | 1140 | Dumfries and
Galloway | 3630 | 1452 | Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale | 2870 | 1148 | Dundee East | 3070 | 1228 | Dundee
West | 3370 | 1348 | Dunfermline and West Fife | 2110 | 844 | East Dunbartonshire | 3010 | 1204 | East
Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow | 3850 | 1540 | East Lothian | 2770 | 1108 | East Renfrewshire | 3020 | 1208 | Edinburgh
East | 2270 | 908 | Edinburgh North and Leith | 2220 | 888 | Edinburgh South | 2230 | 892 | Edinburgh
South West | 2040 | 816 | Edinburgh
West | 2660 | 1064 | Falkirk | 3010 | 1204 | Glasgow Central | 2600 | 1040 | Glasgow
East | 3760 | 1504 | Glasgow North | 2020 | 808 | Glasgow North East | 3880 | 1552 | Glasgow
North West | 3570 | 1428 | Glasgow
South | 3190 | 1276 | Glasgow
South West | 3680 | 1472 | Glenrothes | 2540 | 1016 | Gordon | 1880 | 752 | Inverclyde | 3340 | 1336 | Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey | 2650 | 1060 | Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 3470 | 1388 | Kirkcaldy
and Cowdenbeath | 2880 | 1152 | Lanark and
Hamilton East | 3870 | 1548 | Linlithgow
and East Falkirk | 3110 | 1244 | Livingston | 2450 | 980 | Midlothian | 2220 | 888 | Moray | 2220 | 888 | Motherwell and Wishaw | 3840 | 1536 | Na h-Eileanan
an Iar | 1240 | 496 | North Ayrshire and Arran | 3420 | 1368 | North East Fife | 2200 | 880 | Ochil and
South Perthshire | 2730 | 1092 | Orkney and
Shetland | 1230 | 492 | Paisley
and Renfrewshire North | 3030 | 1212 | Paisley
and Renfrewshire South | 3330 | 1332 | Perth
and North Perthshire | 3180 | 1272 | Ross, Skye
and Lochaber | 2150 | 860 | Rutherglen
and Hamilton West | 3570 | 1428 | Stirling | 2430 | 972 | West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine | 1670 | 668 | West Dunbartonshire | 4110 | 1644 | | Total | 167960 | 67,184 |
Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) May 2009
http://83.244.183.180/100pc/aa_ent/ccparlc/ccaaawd/a_carate_r_ccparlc_c_ccaaawd_may09.html
|